TIMELINE OF NCKU DISMISSAL ACTION

                 TIMELINE OF NCKU DISMISSAL ACTION

---

1. March 29, 1999 - the FLLD review committee passed the "dismissal" decision  (no legal reasons.)

 

2. April 23, 1999 - Appeal to the College of Liberal Arts Review Committee's Appeals group.

 

3. May 3, 1999 - the College of Liberal Arts Appeals Group decided the  "evidences" listed by the FLLD were not objective and solid. The case was sent back to FLLD for them to solidify evidences.

 

4. June 9, 1999 - the College of Liberal Arts Review Committee's Appeals Group rejected the appeal. (This was based on my former student, Chen An-Chun's secret letter submitted by FLLD chair, Li Chung-hsiung, claiming harassment.)

 

5. June 14, 2000 - the College of Liberal Arts Review Committee passed the "dismissal" decision. (No legal reasons.)

 

6. June 25, 1999 - the University Review Committee passed the "dismissal" decision (no legal reasons.)

 

7. July 28, 1999 - Appeal to the University Appeals Committee.

  

8. December 3, 1999 - the University Appeals Committee cancelled the "dismissal" decision. (Chairman was university lawyer, Wang)

 

9. March 10, 2000 - the FLLD Review Committee passed the "dismissal" decision (no reasons.)

 

10. March 21, 2000 - Appeal to the College of Liberal Arts Appeals group.

 

11. March 29, 2000 - the College of Liberal Arts Review Committee's Appeals Group rejected the appeal.

 

12. April 12, 2000 - the College of Liberal Arts Review Committee passed the "dismissal" decision (no reasons.)

 

13. April 17, 2000 - Appeal to the University Review Committee's Appeals Group.

 

14. April 28, 2000 - the University Review Committee's Appeals Group decided that for this case, the FLLD and CLA did not list reasons of dismissal. They should re-review.  

 

15. May 5, 2000 - the FLLD review committee passed the "dismissal" decision  (the same illegal reasons as previous year.)

 

16. May 10, 2000 - the College of Liberal Arts Review Committee passed the "dismissal" decision (the same illegal reasons as previous year.)

 

17. May 24, 2000 - the university review committee passed the "dismissal" decision (the same illegal reasons as previous year.)

 

18. June 12, 2000 - Appealed to the University Appeals Committee.

  

19. August 18, 2000 - the University Appeals Committee rejected the appeal (Chairman was Wang)

 

20. September 5, 2000 - Appeal to the MOE Central Appeals Committee.

  

21. January 8, 2001 - the MOE Central Appeals Committee cancelled the "dismissal" decision.

 

22. May 24, 2001 - the university informed that they have started the investigation of plagiarism, requesting "appellant's" "defense."

 

23. May 24, 2001 - the FLLD review committee passed the "dismissal" decision.

 

24. June 19, 2001 - the College of Liberal Arts review committee passed the "dismissal" decision.

25. June 28, 2001 - Appeal to the University Review Committee's Appeals Group.

 

26. July 5, 2001 - the University Review Committee's Appeals Group rejected the appeal.

 

27. July 23, 2001 - the University Review Committee suspended the "dismissal" decision, and requested that the FLLD provide more evidence to match the requirements of Employment Law: Article 41.

 

28. September 12, 2001 - the university review committee passed the "dismissal" decision (the same illegal reasons as previous year.)

 

29. October 23, 2001 - Appeal to the University Appeals Committee.

  

30. June 18, 2002 - the University Appeals Committee cancelled the "dismissal" decision. (Chairman was a different person).

 

From May 11, 2001 to April 21, 2003 the MOE sent 8 letters urging the university reinstate the professor.

 

31. May 6, 2003 - the university notified of issuing the contract and compensated part of the salary.

 

32. May 20, 2003 - the University Review Committee passed the "plagiarism is a light case, the punishments are：no promotion, no salary increments, no sabbatical leave within next six years."

 

33. March 22, 2004 - the MOE Central Appeals Committee cancelled the "compensating part of the salary" decision, ordered the university to make proper decision within 20 days.

 

34. November 1, 2004 - the MOE Central Appeals Committee cancelled the "punishments" decision, based on the reason the law cannot trace back to these cases occurred before its formal execution.

 

35. August 19, 2004 - the university compensated the rice money but still refused to compensate the four years (1999-2003) yearly salary increment.

36. October 17, 2006 Wang claimed to the Kaohsiung Administrative court: "Foreigners(teachers)are not protected by Educational workers employment law, foreigners are are governed by Employment law, not Teachers law."  37. March 13, 2007 Wang claimed to the Kaohsiung Administrative court: "Foreign teachers are not protected by the Teachers law. When the contract period is fulfilled the hiring-employment relationship spontaneously terminates.

38. August 28, 2007 - the university compensated the four years (1999-2003) yearly salary increment.