Showing posts with label Control Yuan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Control Yuan. Show all posts

Monday, August 2, 2010

Letter to the Control Yuan

5/22/2002 3:48 PM
Subject: Fax sent to CYBCC: Ray Dah-tong ,
Paul Chow

22 May 2002

To the Chairman of the Control Yuan:

I am sending this fax regarding the abuse of my rights at National Cheng
Kung University in Tainan. You are by now familiar with this case, but I
will sum up the main points here.
In early 2001 I won a Ministry of Education appeal against the university,
awarding me my contract and back pay.
Although I have filed official complaints to your agency and to other
agencies in Taiwan,
I have yet to receive a contract or back pay.
Instead, the case has been chased along from one agency to another to no
lawful effect.
Please understand, if Taiwan is to engage with the international community,
it must represent law, which means the enforcement of laws.
Taiwan citizens are protected by laws in my country, as well as other
countries that espouse democracy.
I believe it is your legal responsibility to enforce laws protecting the
rights of American citizens in Taiwan. Simply chasing this case from one
agency to another is not enough. It seems clear to me what must be done if
Taiwan is to prove itself as a nation of laws. It must enforce the Ministry
of Education Appeal decison in my favor. It is apparent at this point that
this can only be done by dismissing university administrative officials who
continue to defy, or otherwise delay, enforcement of the lawful Ministry
ruling. This would include all university officials who are legally
obligated, according to the constitution, to abide by lawful rulings in
Taiwan. This may not be a pleasant task, but it is certainly a necessary
one, if justice, according to Taiwan laws, is to be enforced.
The university's defiance of both law and moral principle is an insult to
Taiwan as well as to the international community of academics.
First, it engaged in countless violations of law in order to effect my
dismissal in the first place;
Second, it is now in defiance of a lawful ruling (and subsequent warning
letters) from the Ministry of Education, the highest legal agency regulating
education in Taiwan;
Finally, regardless of the law, National Cheng Kung University is in
contempt of universal principles of fair play and good faith, upon which all
cultures establish their honor and decency. The university participated in
the appeal process from the very beginning. They never challenged the
legitimacy of the appeal process until AFTER the Ministry ruled in my
favor. No university in the world should be allowed to maintian its
institutional credibility in defiance of universally accepted moral
principles such as honoring one's word.
I respectfully remind you that both the Control Yuan and the Ministry of
Education must do what needs to be done to maintain law in Taiwan. Clearly
the time is past for negotations with National Cheng Kung University and
its derelict officials involved in obstructing the Ministry's lawful
ruling. I repeat: Taiwan citizens are protected by American laws; Taiwan
officials must protect American citizens in Taiwan, even if it means
dismissing officials at National Cheng Kung University in order to effect
legal protection of the rights of all academics in Taiwan, whether foreign
or native.
Sincerely,


Professor Richard de Canio
(06) 237 8626

Letter to the Control Yuan

Control Yuan
Taipei, Taiwan

cc: Ministry of Education, Department of Higher Education

20 July 2003

Dear Sirs

I hereby formally request administrative punishment of the following
officials who violated proper procedures at National Cheng Kung University,
undermining the law and with grievous injury to a professor.

1. Professor LEE HSIANG-HSIUNG held a closed meeting using secret and
uninvestigated accusations to effect my dismissal in March, 1999. Although
Professor Lee has transferred to another university, he should be held
accountable for his actions at our university.

2. Professor TU YUNG-CHING while Dean of the College of Liberal Arts
in 1999, accepted a secret letter from a student disputing a grade eight
years earlier. Allowing a student to dispute a grade received eight years
earlier is in itself absurd. In addition, the accusation was secret and
accepted on no other basis than that the student vowed her claim was true
and she would repeat her claim in court if asked. If I told Professor Tu I
would repeat in court my claim that I was Santa Claus, I suspect he would
believe I was Santa Claus. Either Professor Tu sincerely believed this
student, in which case he is guilty of incompetence; or he collaborated with
Professor Lee Hsiang-Hsiung to insure my dismissal, in which case he is
guilty of malicious misconduct. Either way he should be punished.

3. Professor LEE CHEN-ER, chaired university hearings on my dismissal
and allowed the student letter to circulate secretly. Professor Lee should
be held accountable for this.

4. Professor KO HUEI-CHEN, currently Dean of Student Affairs, has
repeatedly declined my attempt to hold a meeting between the student who
wrote a secret letter and myself in the Dean's office. This is an attempt
to obstruct administrative remedy at our university and is unacceptable.
Her vice-dean, Professor JAMES TSAI, has also prevented a meeting between me
and this student. Apart from proven misconduct, a teacher has a right to
have a supervised meeting with a student for any reason whatsoever.
Officials who are unable or unwilling to do their jobs, according to law,
should be dismissed.

5. Professor KAO CHIANG, currently president of our university, should
be held accountable for the university defying a Ministry appeal ruling for
more than two years, undermining confidence in law at our university,
harming the reputation of our university, and costing taxpayers millions of
dollars.
He should also be held accountable for a university hearing in May
2003 at which I was accused of offenses already rejected in the Ministry
Appeal ruling of 8 January 2001. This meeting undermined the legal
benefits of the Ministry ruling and violates my rights as well as the law.
Finally, Professor Kao should be held accountable for repeated delays
in full administrative remedy and compensation for my illegal dismissal in
1999, including a formal apology and full retroactive salary.
If Professor Kao can defy the Ministry of Education for two years, he
cannot claim to be following "proper procedures" by delaying administrative
remedy for my illegal dismissal in 1999. If within days following its
belated compliance with the Ministry ruling, the university was able to
convene a meeting to repeat accusations already rejected in that ruling,
obviously the university can act as quickly to enforce justice as to defy
it.
But under color of law, a handful of officials are dictating policy at
our university. This is not the right way to run a university and this is
not the right way to advance education in Taiwan. The best teachers from
abroad will not improve education in Taiwan if offiicials collaborate in
misconduct and obstruct administrative remedy.

Sincerely,


Professor Richard de Canio
Department of Foreign Languages and Literature
National Cheng Kung University
(06) 237 8626

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

[Fwd: Forward of Letter to President Lai of National Cheng Kung University]



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Forward of Letter to President Lai of National Cheng Kung University
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:40:17 +0800
From: rdca25@gmail.com
To: em50000@email.ncku.edu.tw
CC: z7908037@email.ncku.edu.tw, ncku.sevp@sevp.ncku.edu.tw, hhhwung@mail.ncku.edu.tw, cymail@ms.cy.gov.tw, scholarsatrisk@nyu.edu, tahr@tpts8.seed.net.tw, tahr@seed.net.tw, academicfreedom@aaup.org, ssmee@aaup.org


Control Yuan
Taipei, Taiwan

Scholars at Risk Network
New York University

Department of Academic Freedom and Tenure
American Association of University Professors
1133 19th Street, NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20036

Taiwan Association for Human Rights
Taiwan

Dr. Michael Ming-Chiao Lai
President, National Cheng Kung University

Da Hsuan Feng,
Senior Executive Vice President

Dr. Hwung-Hweng Hwung,
Senior Executive Vice President

Dr. Chang Kao-Ping,
Dean of the College of Liberal Arts

Professor Huang Cheng Neng,
Chair of the NCKU Faculty Union



13 October 2009


Dear President Lai,

Since you became president of National Cheng Kung University, I have asked several times to make an appointment with you. The purpose is to effect a just resolution in the case of my illegal dismissal in 1999 (a summary of issues is below).
    I hope you understand I cannot compromise on this issue. I will not allow an American professor to be treated unjustly without remedy at a Taiwan university. It's my responsibility as an American, as well as an academic, to effect a just resolution in this case, comparable to the justice a Taiwanese professor or student would receive in my country. Whether from principles of justice or reciprocity, you should be concerned about this case.
    No reputable academic institution would allow the misconduct involved in my illegal dismissal, much less tolerate—or refuse to remedy—them. No president of a reputable university should ignore a case of this magnitude, especially since NCKU has many academic exchanges with American universities. Some universities, such as Purdue, have been especially helpful in NCKU's academic development. Indeed, as I understand, Purdue intends to send representatives to NCKU to honor those exchanges in the near future. Frankly I don't think a Taiwan university that violates the human rights of an American professor should be allowed academic exchanges with an American university.
    My treatment at the hands of NCKU officials can only be described as disgraceful. Only the intervention of the court and the Ministry of Education enabled my reinstatement and even then after an unjust delay (see below) and without remedy.
    A university that lacks a legitimate protocol of internal remedy is at a critical stage. This impacts not only on human rights but on academic integrity, for obvious reasons.
    Not only did the department allow an egregiously illegal dismissal in the first place (including a secret letter, unproved accusations, and a dismissal meeting of which I wasn't even informed), but all subsequent "appeal" and "review" hearings expediently rubber-stamped the dismissal as if it were a foregone conclusion that officials are always in the right even when they're transparently in violation of basic legal rights. A policy whereby officials are always in the right even when they do something wrong is not a recipe for democracy.
    As you may know, former president Kao Chiang defied a legal Ministry ruling, claiming foreigners had no right to appeal even after the university held appeal hearings and attended the MOE appeal in Taipei (see attachments). Taiwan is hailed as a democracy compared to Mainland China. The irony is, in Mainland China officials would at least honor an appeal.
    I have fought this case for more than ten years. During four of those years my academic career was interrupted at National Cheng Kung University. Even after reinstatement by the combined pressure of the court and Ministry of Education, I spent considerable time trying to effect a just resolution to this case, while being ignored by past and current administrations, not to mention faculty colleagues.
    Simply being reinstated is not justice, no more than it is justice if a bank robber returns stolen money or a kidnapper a child. Justice entails apology, compensation, penalties.
    First, as an American, I must insure Americans in Taiwan are not similarly mistreated in the future.
    Second, I have expended considerable resources for which I should be compensated, including expenses abroad to renew my visas. Colleagues with a conscience assisted me at considerable cost to themselves, often until the early morning hours. As Jesus said, the worker is entitled to his wages.
    Third, in lawful societies damages are awarded to punish willful misconduct or negligence. From the first, Faculty Union members warned officials their actions were illegal. (But does an official at a high-ranked university need to be warned it's illegal to circulate a secret letter?) These officials were stubbornly defiant or woefully ignorant. Either way it does not reflect well on National Cheng Kung University.
    Fourth, the university is obligated to issue a formal apology, or else it's assumed the university believes it did nothing wrong or even that it's above the law. Such a policy is untenable for an accredited institution.
    Fifth, the status of officials who defied the law or colluded in doing so should not shield them from penalties of the law, at least if NCKU wishes to uphold its standing as a credible academic institution enforcing human rights principles. Those responsible should be punished, whether it's the student who wrote the secret letter, the committee chairs who circulated it, or the university president who defied a legal Ministry ruling for more than two years. Not to punish them is to condone them as well as their misconduct.
    Sixth, the university should complete remedy by formalizing prescribed steps to prevent similar misconduct in the future. Such protocol at reputable foreign universities minimizes the risk of a Taiwan student or teacher being discriminated against. It's reasonable I want to insure reciprocal protections for Americans in Taiwan. The fact that such an egregiously illegal dismissal would repeatedly pass all levels of appeal and review at our university should be of grave concern to faculty and officials concerned about the future of our university.
   
    Sincerely,

    Richard de Canio
    Department of Foreign Languages and Literature
    National Cheng Kung University
    Tainan, Taiwan

Summary of Human Rights Abuses at National Cheng Kung University

    1. National Cheng Kung University is a high-ranked university in Taiwan, which makes its rights violations of international concern. Furthermore it has numerous academic exchanges with American universities and should therefore be bound by shared principles of legal rights.
    2. The university's actions went beyond a violation of human rights and defied even principles of fair play. Surely no reputable academic institution would participate in an appeal then challenge the ruling because it lost.
    3. The university's dismissal action was egregiously improper to begin with, including the circulation of a secret letter I was not allowed to view except by court order.
    4. The university's subsequent appeal hearings were a charade, since the secret letter was circulated. At one hearing, the chair defiantly refused to reveal the contents of the letter.
    5. When the university reversed the dismissal (for technical reasons) the case was returned to the department for "more proof," though it should have been canceled. The university argued foreigners had no employment rights (a claim rejected by the Ministry of Education). University hearings were presumably a delay tactic to outlast my short-term visas.
    6. After the Ministry of Education reversed the dismissal in January 2001 the university defied the ruling, claiming foreigners had no right to appeal, though the university participated in the appeal and held its own appeals.
    7. University president, Kao Chiang, defied the Ministry of Education ruling for more than two years (from January 2001 to May 2003), despite eight warning letters from the MOE (previously attached) and letters from the US-based human rights group, Scholars at Risk (previously attached).
    8. Meanwhile, university officials argued the university would delay the case in the courts indefinitely unless I resigned at half pay.
    9. Even after reinstatement the university held hearings to impose penalties, despite the Ministry ruling in my favor. These penalties were reversed by the MOE.
    10. No official has been punished, either by the courts or the Ministry of Education, though documentation of abuses is transparent (documents previously attached). Even after university president Kao Chiang defied the MOE for more than two years, he was
approved for another three-year term. One questions what "democracy" means in Taiwan.
    11. My colleagues have thus far ignored the case and even sat on "review" hearings after the MOE ruling, as if that ruling had no legal force. Mainland China may not be a democracy, but an appeal ruling would be final there.
    12. I have not received a formal apology from the university or compensation, nor did the courts award damages. Yet the case interrupted my academic career for at least four years, involved numerous trips abroad to renew short-term visas, and cost me and at least one colleague countless hours reading dozens of official documents, translating them, sending replies, and attending numerous university and court hearings. Since my reinstatement I have spent considerable time trying to effect just closure in this case.
    From what I learned at another college, my case was actually used at orientation sessions for new college officials to warn what not to do!
    Surely American universities have the authority to sanction such misconduct at an exchange university. Surely Taiwan's academics are not above international laws of human rights and principles of reciprocity and fair play. Surely academic exchanges are not merely financial transactions but are governed by legal and moral principles.

    Sincerely,


    Richard de Canio
    Associate Professor
    Department of Foreign Languages and Literature
    National Cheng Kung University
    Tainan, Taiwan


[Fwd: A FORMAL PETITION to the CONTROL YUAN regarding human rights abuses at National Cheng Kung University]



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: A FORMAL PETITION to the CONTROL YUAN regarding human rights abuses at National Cheng Kung University
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:06:29 +0800
From: rdca25@gmail.com
To: cymail@ms.cy.gov.tw, mail@ms.cy.gov.tw
CC: Raydon <raydon@mail.ncku.edu.tw>
References: <4A5E870C.1080001@gmail.com> <001c01ca05de$34a5f350$6822748c@pjP>


THE CONTROL YUAN
No.2, Sec. 1, Zhongxiao E. Rd.,
Taipei City 10051, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:+886-2-2341-3183
Fax:+886-2-2341-0324

cc: Professor Ray Da-ton,
Faculty Union
National Cheng Kung University
(06) 2757575-62831
raydon@mail.ncku.edu.tw

23 April 2010

To the Members of the Control Yuan,

This is to petition the Control Yuan to formally resolve human rights violations committed by National Cheng Kung University in Tainan, Taiwan, with evidence attached. The university, after repeated petitions, has denied remedy and compensation, forcing my appeal to the Control Yuan.
    Please understand the importance of resolving this case within formal channels in Taiwan. I do not believe American universities can or should maintain academic exchanges with a university that violates human rights, evident in the attached documents. The documents make clear that university officials did not merely act recklessly, but willfully and maliciously, in defiance of principles of law and human rights.
    The university completed an illegal dismissal. It circulated a secret letter at meetings. It participated in appeal hearings at both the university and Ministry levels, then, when it lost, claimed foreigners had no right to appeal in the first place. Then for more than two years it defied issuance of teaching contracts despite repeated warnings from the Ministry of Education that they were in defiance of the law by doing so. This is not the way a reputable academic institution conducts itself.
    We allow remedy to Taiwan citizens for similar offenses in the United States, my native country. Moreover, formal remedy, penalties and punitive damages act as deterrents to discourage repeat offenses.
    A failure to proportionately punish officials involved in this case will jeopardize foreign faculty in the future, since university officials know they have nothing to lose. But it may also jeopardize academic exchanges between Taiwan and American universities. Failure to effect formal remedy in this case is not the way to insure human rights or academic standards in Taiwan.
    I have sent several letters to university officials, including current president,
Lai Ming-Chiao, but I've been ignored. Below is a typical response from the president's office. It's an email dated 21 December 2007 promising "to study and communicate with your directly."

Subject: Re: Regarding Ming Chiao-lai's delays in handling the case at National Cheng Kung University
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:33:27 +0800
From: em50000 <em50000@email.ncku.edu.tw>
To: <rdca25@gmail.com>
CC: <wslee@mail.ncku.edu.tw>
References: <4758A02B.2060900@gmail.com>


Dear Professor De Canio,
 
Sorry to have you wait for this reply due to President Lai's heavy load of NCKU's affairs.
President Lai will assign representatives to study and communicate with you directly.
Thank you for your patience.
 
Sincerely Yours,
 
Officie of The Secretariat,
National Cheng-Kung University,
 
    I never heard from anyone again.
    Silence or indifference is not an option in a serious case such as this. Apparently President Lai believes that opening a coffee shop on campus is more important than resolving serious human rights abuses at the university.


    Respectfully yours,


    Richard de Canio
    Department of Foreign Languages and Literature
    National Cheng Kung University

[Fwd: A FORMAL PETITION to the CONTROL YUAN regarding human rights abuses at National Cheng Kung University]



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: A FORMAL PETITION to the CONTROL YUAN regarding human rights abuses at National Cheng Kung University
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:06:29 +0800
From: rdca25@gmail.com
To: cymail@ms.cy.gov.tw, mail@ms.cy.gov.tw
CC: Raydon <raydon@mail.ncku.edu.tw>
References: <4A5E870C.1080001@gmail.com> <001c01ca05de$34a5f350$6822748c@pjP>


THE CONTROL YUAN
No.2, Sec. 1, Zhongxiao E. Rd.,
Taipei City 10051, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:+886-2-2341-3183
Fax:+886-2-2341-0324

cc: Professor Ray Da-ton,
Faculty Union
National Cheng Kung University
(06) 2757575-62831
raydon@mail.ncku.edu.tw

23 April 2010

To the Members of the Control Yuan,

This is to petition the Control Yuan to formally resolve human rights violations committed by National Cheng Kung University in Tainan, Taiwan, with evidence attached. The university, after repeated petitions, has denied remedy and compensation, forcing my appeal to the Control Yuan.
    Please understand the importance of resolving this case within formal channels in Taiwan. I do not believe American universities can or should maintain academic exchanges with a university that violates human rights, evident in the attached documents. The documents make clear that university officials did not merely act recklessly, but willfully and maliciously, in defiance of principles of law and human rights.
    The university completed an illegal dismissal. It circulated a secret letter at meetings. It participated in appeal hearings at both the university and Ministry levels, then, when it lost, claimed foreigners had no right to appeal in the first place. Then for more than two years it defied issuance of teaching contracts despite repeated warnings from the Ministry of Education that they were in defiance of the law by doing so. This is not the way a reputable academic institution conducts itself.
    We allow remedy to Taiwan citizens for similar offenses in the United States, my native country. Moreover, formal remedy, penalties and punitive damages act as deterrents to discourage repeat offenses.
    A failure to proportionately punish officials involved in this case will jeopardize foreign faculty in the future, since university officials know they have nothing to lose. But it may also jeopardize academic exchanges between Taiwan and American universities. Failure to effect formal remedy in this case is not the way to insure human rights or academic standards in Taiwan.
    I have sent several letters to university officials, including current president,
Lai Ming-Chiao, but I've been ignored. Below is a typical response from the president's office. It's an email dated 21 December 2007 promising "to study and communicate with your directly."

Subject: Re: Regarding Ming Chiao-lai's delays in handling the case at National Cheng Kung University
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:33:27 +0800
From: em50000 <em50000@email.ncku.edu.tw>
To: <rdca25@gmail.com>
CC: <wslee@mail.ncku.edu.tw>
References: <4758A02B.2060900@gmail.com>


Dear Professor De Canio,
 
Sorry to have you wait for this reply due to President Lai's heavy load of NCKU's affairs.
President Lai will assign representatives to study and communicate with you directly.
Thank you for your patience.
 
Sincerely Yours,
 
Officie of The Secretariat,
National Cheng-Kung University,
 
    I never heard from anyone again.
    Silence or indifference is not an option in a serious case such as this. Apparently President Lai believes that opening a coffee shop on campus is more important than resolving serious human rights abuses at the university.


    Respectfully yours,


    Richard de Canio
    Department of Foreign Languages and Literature
    National Cheng Kung University